@namark: Thank you for the reference about generics,I think you and me have different goals on computational methods, your view is more about representations (let me make a guarded haskell expression and let other people worry about implementation),there are many tools for that functional.cafe/@amiloradovsky, +2 for Coq =), ghc is the most advanced tool today), mine is about the smallest more efficient way that any computer could do a specific operation or function,portability is extremely important

Follow

@gassahara you completely misinterpret my stance it seems. Minimal efficient abstraction is my goal as well, throughout mathematics hardware and software, I just don't draw any arbitrary lines. Behind the hardware design that you try to optimize for today is a programmer like you. Tomorrow you should both be engineers, working together and not plating blind catch-up with each other.

· · SubwayTooter · 0 · 0 · 0
Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.