A Nature Medicine news feature floats the idea of not having a control arm in clinical trials. Unfortunately the cost in money and lives of having a control arm is the difference between science and superstition.

nature.com/articles/s41591-023

Follow

@pfh I think though, it's important to contextualise this. There are situations (e.g. in oncology, or like in the article rare disease and personalised medicine) where one-armed trials have a place. I don't think anyone is advocating ditching controls in general. It's a fine line to walk, though, I agree.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.