Follow
https://reason.com/2024/02/12/protect-act-could-require-removal-of-all-existing-porn-online/ That doesn't sound good, it also still seems unconstitutional.
https://reason.com/2024/02/12/protect-act-could-require-removal-of-all-existing-porn-online/ That doesn't sound good, it also still seems unconstitutional.
No, it is not "saving the children" this time (names like this are usually a red flag for that), instead it is supposed to "save the women".