@peterdrake PArt of the reason for that is that while being the most popular it doesnt have a very big piece of the pie. I dont remember the exact percentage but were talking single digits or less. Other countries, even ones with smaller populations, have a larger disparity where the most popular name will be a much larger chunk int erms of %.
Ive read up on some hard research on this topic. It basically boils down to older societies and languages tend to have greater disparity. So a young language/country like the USA wont have very many Smiths overall, but older languages and countries like chinese will have a rather large portion of their population all with the same name.
Long story short over time the number of surnames tends towards 1.
CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.
@peterdrake PArt of the reason for that is that while being the most popular it doesnt have a very big piece of the pie. I dont remember the exact percentage but were talking single digits or less. Other countries, even ones with smaller populations, have a larger disparity where the most popular name will be a much larger chunk int erms of %.
Ive read up on some hard research on this topic. It basically boils down to older societies and languages tend to have greater disparity. So a young language/country like the USA wont have very many Smiths overall, but older languages and countries like chinese will have a rather large portion of their population all with the same name.
Long story short over time the number of surnames tends towards 1.