Show newer

I'm tired of living like it's the 1600s:

Can I afford eggs at the market?
Are my family going to die of the plague?
Puritans are coming for my sinful lifestyle.

I want modern problems.
Modern Problems.

@ninpnin @JustineSmithies I agree. Unless you have some compelling reason, it's much simpler to use a list rather than several different numbered variables.

I had to take a relative to urgent care (everyone's fine) right after class today and nobody at the medical facility commented on the fact that I was still wearing a lavalier mic.

all-lady A-Team reboot needs to happen

Here's @susanlbridges and my Hannibal, B. A., Murdock, Face

TELL ME YOU DON'T NEED THIS RIGHT NOW. You can't, because you'd be a liar.

@arstechnica I choose to not follow the link (or even look at the picture) and assume a "wet dress rehearsal for Starship" is a practice performance of "Knee Deep in the Hoopla" in which all of the performers (regardless of gender) are clad in soaked evening gowns.

Both parties have held the debt ceiling hostage as a political tool. For example, in 2011, the Republicans did it. But in 2013, the Republicans did it. On the other hand, this year it is the Republicans who are doing it.

Somewhere an aging Volkswagen marketing executive is muttering, "1975 was the real year of the rabbit."

Answer 

@RecursiveNeuron I'm going to guess it's an error, because Python doesn't have the ++ operator.

If it turns out Python added it when I wasn't looking, and it behaves like other languages, it will print 3 twice.

Testing it out on Python 3.10.1, I'm surprised to learn that Python has a unary + operator, which (in this case) does nothing. The code therefore prints 2 twice.

Answer 

@RecursiveNeuron I'm going to guess it's an error, because Python doesn't have the ++ operator.

If it turns out Python added it when I wasn't looking, and it behaves like other languages, it will print 3 twice.

Testing it out on Python 3.10.1, I'm surprised to learn that Python has a unary + operator, which (in this case) does nothing. The code therefore prints 2 twice.

We played the "learning scenario" of BattleLore. @htdrake won, but we're both a bit mystified as to how; she rolled worse (as is her wont), lost more figures, and didn't feel that she knew what she was doing.

She expressed that wargames are more frustrating than economic eurogames, because you're losing things rather than building them. It strikes me that Go straddles this in an interesting way: beyond a certain skill level, players can see trouble coming and avoid actual capture. There's even a Go proverb, "big groups don't die". That said, strong Go players play at the razor's edge of their abilities, so occasionally something big does die.

It’s very funny to me that the dominant Twentieth Century conception of AI was a slightly awkward nerd with an inhuman mastery of facts and logic, when what we actually got is smooth-talking bullshit artists who can’t do eighth-grade math.

When I post a mastodon link elsehwere (e.g., in an email signature), which should I use? Why?

Show older
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.