This. I understand going against a research or an hypothesis, trying to get it down or demolish it, but censorship on a valid research? We wouldn't have had Darwin, Newton, Wegener or Patterson that way.
And is not like fact go away just because you close your eyes, anyway.
What I think is disturbing is the technical possibility that is there for a majority to put so many obstacles on a scientific work.
There is a big flaw in the oligopoly of a few big research papers that owns the copyright of most of the researches right now, and that is something I find deeply disturbing.
Do you know of works being done to solve such a gigantic issue?
Follow
@arteteco @rnitsch @peterdrake I agree, it's problematic.
