There is a lot of discussion on moderation in social networks. Good moderation is a core requirement for a network. I just read this [article](https://newsletter.danhon.com/archive/s13e23-colliders-speedrunning-benevolent/) which I find a good analysis.

A problem faced by Mastodon is having sufficient volunteer moderators and consistent moderation. Witness the recent faux pas on one of the instances that resulted in a public apology.

# Suggestion
Would a 2 tiered moderation work? The report goes to a review group that can handle specific, well-defined situations. If they can't handle a situation, it is forwarded to the main moderators who make the big judgment calls.