65535 characters is quite a lot.

Let's make it B E A U T I F U L:

If we know that \(A \wedge B \implies C\) holds, and we are aware of \(A\) being true, then we can infer \(C\) holds by using _modus ponens_ :)

@saxarona your LaTex has no power here 😂 but I wish it did!

@friday The qoto instance says it has! 😢 what a bummer haha

@friday @saxarona
I see some formatting when viewing on quoto.org although it is plaintext, crazy spacing, and no nice font handling. I do see the symbols for \wedge and \implies. Of course, there is no deduction by modus ponens if only A is asserted to be true.

@orcmid @friday completely forgot about B over there; of course.

The crazy spacing happens to me as well..

@Satrofu @saxarona @friday
A^B => C, ~C |- ~( A ^ B)

easy enough with truth table, just like modus ponens is. (Classical truth value semantics)

@orcmid @saxarona @friday that's called nodus tollens right?. If a implies b, and not b holds then not a holds.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.