@Prodigal
That's not her personal trainer that's just drake.
She can have more than one personal trainer.

Anyways it's obvious to everyone that Adonis can't possibly be the progeny of Drake and that dark haired tan skinned woman.
The baby had lighter skin and hair than either of them.
@andreas @11112011 @GhostOfMoshe @Heliodramus @IAMAL_PHARIUS @Jdogg247 @NEETzsche @Oblivia @PonyPanda @Terry @ThreeOneThreeChris @Zerglingman @ZogBot123 @alcade @amnesiac @izzilis @lewdthewides @leyonhjelm @mguw @mushroom_soup @p @r000t @redneonglow @sean @sjw @sneeden @stevejail @thebitchisback @thedonnerd @verita84
@Andrii @Prodigal @11112011 @GhostOfMoshe @Heliodramus @IAMAL_PHARIUS @Jdogg247 @NEETzsche @Oblivia @PonyPanda @Terry @Zerglingman @ZogBot123 @alcade @amnesiac @andreas @izzilis @lewdthewides @leyonhjelm @mguw @mushroom_soup @p @r000t @redneonglow @sean @sjw @sneeden @stevejail @thebitchisback @thedonnerd @verita84 If Drake was dumb enough to claim that kid as his, then he’s got an legally-enforceable 18-year financial commitment to the child and its mother, and she ended up getting from him what she was undoubtedly after all the way from the beginning.
@ThreeOneThreeChris @Andrii @11112011 @GhostOfMoshe @Heliodramus @IAMAL_PHARIUS @Jdogg247 @NEETzsche @Oblivia @PonyPanda @Prodigal @Terry @Zerglingman @ZogBot123 @alcade @amnesiac @andreas @izzilis @lewdthewides @leyonhjelm @mguw @mushroom_soup @p @r000t @redneonglow @sean @sjw @sneeden @stevejail @thedonnerd @verita84 A lot of places you just need a sporadic relationship when a pregnancy began or thereafter to be classified as a father, regardless of parentage. Parentage went out the window, legally, once they started allowing faggots and lesbians to access IVF and surrogacy. Maternity, paternity and biological connections, don't matter anymore.
@Prodigal @11112011 @Andrii @GhostOfMoshe @Heliodramus @IAMAL_PHARIUS @Jdogg247 @NEETzsche @Oblivia @PonyPanda @Terry @ThreeOneThreeChris @Zerglingman @ZogBot123 @alcade @amnesiac @andreas @izzilis @lewdthewides @leyonhjelm @mguw @mushroom_soup @p @r000t @redneonglow @sean @sjw @sneeden @stevejail @thedonnerd @verita84 It's a reset though, that doesn't need to occur. If people stopped being fed the lie of monogamy and marriage, you'd wind up having to evaluate, what the outcomes could actually present. For a mass population, that could mean holding a tyrant government to account and dictate to facilitate, the engagement of stripping wastefulness. Ever time consuming, costly avenues to crotch support, those that think, there's an easy way out of a relationship or children. There isn't. Point blank the whole, stratagem. That's the gambit, essentially. Child support alone, being enforced, is an encroachment of basic parental rights to decide how best to financially raise a child. Rather than be mandated and thrown into income brackets that best meets the reflective, net income versus self supporting income withheld. There's never any transparency and actual, accountability, to be assured it's matched via visitation access or rights therefore attached herewith. That requires orders sought on behalf of a child's best interests, to maintain an ongoing relationship with the other parent, payer. It's the payee solely, that is mostly the filing applicant, in such matters. Cyclic control and conformity, begins with marriage licences and birth registrations. Refuse to be a number. Refuse to be lumped into the government, dependent variable. The mechanics of political debates, many here fail to even touch, let alone discuss.

Timely that.
Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.