@dave Erm.... uhhh.... I'd call this approach 'eclectic'. 😬

like, most of them are more like political commentators
In the realm of philosophy is there really anything left to explore?
@dave @neglesaks @skells Not in it's current paradigm. There are many lessons from modernity we haven't studied yet.
Follow

@admin @dave @neglesaks Zizek and Taleb are the only people who come to mind

i get the sense that a lot of the people who might've been academic philosophers are working in AI, although academic philosphers and philosophers are a different breed in my mind

@skells @dave @neglesaks Academic philosophers aren't really philosophers, at least not in a historical context. Historically philosophers covered more common and universal topics, where as academic philosophers will concentrate on niche topics, like theory of mind, to justify their salaries.

The co-opting of academia by the left probably hasn't helped with this. It's easy to retreat to a politically non-volatile niche topic to avoid upsetting the wrong people.
Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.