Simpson's paradox, which also goes by several other names, is a phenomenon in probability and statistics in which a trend appears in several groups of data but disappears or reverses when the groups are combined. This result is often encountered in social-science and medical-science statistics,[1][2][3] and is particularly problematic when frequency data are unduly given causal interpretations.[4] The paradox can be resolved when confounding variables and causal relations are appropriately addressed in the statistical modeling.[4][5] Simpson's paradox has been used to illustrate the kind of misleading results that the misuse of statistics can generate.[6][7]
Screenshot 2022-09-08 at 09-24-33 Toby Young no Twitter.png

@11112011 you've been reading Taleb, should be pretty simple to do the analysis and demonstrate why ivm doesn't work

@skells + Stat biases
+ Difference betw RCT & observation
+ Simpson's paradox
+ Quackery
+ You must ALSO apply "they make money" to cars, baking goods, wine, condoms, subscription to his newsletter, etc.
Follow

@11112011 I'm sure Pfizer would pay a lot to anyone who could convincingly make the case in favour of their product

strangely all I've seen is handwaving

· · SubwayTooter · 1 · 0 · 1
@skells u see what u look to comfirm what u belive to be true, that why u always get triggered at ivermectin post that almost pavlovian mate :02lul:

@11112011 all I do is minimise exposure based on evidence, enjoying my natural immunity as we speak

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.