any artist worth his salt will see good AI art as competition
@harblinger figure out what it's good at, what's it's not, use it for the former and step up your game on the latter
@harblinger computers didn't put mathematicians out of business, just extended their reach
@harblinger no it killed the jobs of people who sat around doing raw calculation and added jobs in coding, computer science, database management, IT...
@harblinger my line of thinking is that people learn how to turn tools to their advantage, computers have created more jobs than they have destroyed
the Klaus Schwab deal is thinking that you can hose printed money at 50 large corporations you control and magically create a technological singularity
@genmaicha yeah but your composition is weak step it up HAL got that shit down
@genmaicha this is my point, AI will drive artists to innovate
@genmaicha I think it will have a similar effect that computers had in maths and physics, people still do plenty of pen and paper mathematics but simulations are used to increase the reach and possibilities available.
artists will blend the strengths of what AI can do with their own unique skills, insights and ideas and create art which is greater than the sum of its parts
@genmaicha yeah I think that's a good way of putting it, although the real pay dirt will be on learning to synthesise is with the rest of your work/ideas
@genmaicha imagine Raphael doing The Academy but with hundreds of his own sketches teaching a computer to learn a grander composition, which then gives him a rough outline to work upon
loads of renaissance artists had understudies who painted things for them, this is just a more accessible/programmable version
@genmaicha then imagine someone using AI and human understudies in conjunction!
@genmaicha Jeff is killer at soft materials, Hannah knows how to get the skin tone just right
(I'd also start researching how to build DIY EMP weapons, because that may be the only way out)