I find it troubling that journalists let a single ad-funded business take over and centralize this function, and took so long to realize it was a bad idea :/
> Twitter has been my second home for more than a decade. It’s where I post articles, read articles by other journalists, and keep tabs on researchers and newsmakers. Long ago, Twitter replaced the newswires—AP, Reuters, etc.—that I used to keep open in a tab on my computer desktop.
https://themarkup.org/newsletter/hello-world/mastodons-moment
This is equally disturbing, for similar reasons. So much power over the organs of public truth-making in so few hands :/
> a realization that we in journalism had just outsourced that whole [identity verification] process, that whole decision-making, to whoever happened to work at Twitter. As a profession, we didn’t think, or at least I wasn’t part of any larger conversations, about the verification process. We just trusted that there was some office at Twitter that was making the right calls.
@strypey
> @journalist@publishingCompany.com
Some journalists acquire a reputation independent of their employer. Some are employed by more than 1 organization. Self-hosting seems worth the effort, assuming they have a backup discipline. They would get a blog etc. along with it if running Epicyon for example.
@tetrislife I get your point, but in this case publishingCompany.com would be the domain name of their own professional website, instead of that of their current employer(s). For instance @george@social.monbiot.com, instead of @georgemonbiot@social.theguardian.com