Show newer
timorl boosted
simulation theory is boring
who cares if we're in a simulation? it doesn't change the fact that if there are gods we should kill them
timorl boosted

i was thinking about how I ask questions that I can look up on a search engine. even more than a book, it's not too expensive to get an answer from a search engine, so people might say "let me google that for you", implying that you might have just typed your question into Google's search engine to get an answer more efficiently. leaving aside that crafting a good query can be nontrivial, especially if the subject matter is new to you, I think asking a *person* a question also serves to inform that person that there's a question to be asked. in other words, a person may not realize there was any confusion about a term or phrase, and would continue to use it, assuming everyone knows the meaning or will find out, but if someone asks, then they might learn that, in that context, it's good to unpack the meaning.

@eloisa It's just the Nvidia incident. I saw the video before she had the opportunity to tell me, so it was quite surprizing seeing a friend in something viral. Anyway, this is a decent video including the question: yewtu.be/watch?v=IVpOyKCNZYw @schratze

@jeder I got this book from a friend when my first kid was born. The contents are even stupider than you would expect knowing the author.

@schratze You forgot to write what you think about witches, e.g. one of my friends is a witch and she once asked Linus Torvalds a question the answer to which went viral, so strongly support. @eloisa

@miklo Chyba pytanie czy Peertube lub Owncast mają zaimplementowaną sensowną dostępność. Jeśli nie, to nie bardzo można je polecać. @jaczad

timorl boosted

@unfa It's not quite undeniable and my low prior makes me still skeptical (because this kind of listening in, while technically possible, is challenging and does not provide much advantage over what G already has on people).

Some other possibilities:
* both you and your friend organized the meeting with G's knowledge, e.g. mails over gmail.
* the Jitsi instance you used was hosted in Denmark (someone already pointed out this language was actually Danish) and you accessed it with Chrome (or in another way that made G aware)
* same as above, but your friend sent you some link to a Dutch-adjecent webpage and you opened it in a way that made G aware
There are probably other ways like this, so you can try coming up with some yourself, since you know better what you did. ;p

Although, as I wrote above, this is technically possible, so I'm definitely not calling you a crank. It's just unlikely.

timorl boosted

« Today, #FFmpeg made a new release, numbered 5.0, called Lorentz. This release is a major release, with numerous API changes, a few new features, and because we hope to have this one as LTS. » jbkempf.com/blog/post/2022/FFm

timorl boosted

Good read: You block ads in your browser, why not in your city?

The article reminded me of this quote:

People are taking the piss out of you everyday. They butt into your life, take a cheap shot at you and then disappear. They leer at you from tall buildings and make you feel small. They make flippant comments from buses that imply you’re not sexy enough and that all the fun is happening somewhere else. They are on TV making your girlfriend feel inadequate. … Fuck that. Any advert in a public space that gives you no choice whether you see it or not is yours. It’s yours to take, re-arrange and re-use. You can do whatever you like with it. Asking for permission is like asking to keep a rock someone just threw at your head.

— Adaptation from a Banksy essay in defense of remixing (“vandalising”) public advertisements.

Fundamentally, all these ads share the quality of showing people content they didn’t ask for to lure consumers into spending money they otherwise wouldn’t have. Why the wouldn’t I block them everywhere? It’s disgusting.

I know many people like to argue that they’re a “necessary evil” to pay for content, but I have little patience for this argument because it assumes that vendors are entitled to the success of their flawed business models, and people should give up freedoms to support the industry.

My consciousness is not for sale, sorry.

@anedroid Apple tego nie potrzebuje, na tyle kontroluje swój ekosystem, że może mieć wszystko zcentralizowane. Zagrożeniem są raczej pomysły by różne appki sprawdzały że masz NFT do np. swojego awatara. Już teraz niektóre wprowadzają to opcjonalnie, a jak się dostatecznie znormalizuje to pewno będzie obowiązkowe.

Same NFT są narzędziem, problemem są zastosowania w kiernku których idą.
@madargon

@anedroid Ehh, w pewnym sensie? Ale potencjalnie mocno szersze niż rzeczy o których obecnie myślimy jako "digital rights", i jednocześnie może być ino fragmentem pełnego systemu DRMowego. @madargon

@anedroid Dosłownie "unikalny znacznik" i to jest technologia która ma pewne praktyczne, choć niszowe, zastosowania. Kontrowersja jest stąd że obecnie jest używana niemal wyłącznie jako piramida finansowa albo do prania brudnych pieniędzy. Dłużejterminowo ma szansę sie przyczynić do ostrzejszego egzekwowania i być może rozszerzenia reguł związanych z własnością intelektualną (imo to niedobrz, ale ymmv) oraz pewnych zmian w finansowaniu sztuki (ciężko powiedzieć z jakimi efektami, ale nie jestem optymistyczny). Jak pisałem wyżej są też sensowne zastosowania, ale są tak niszowe że spotkałem się ino z jednym w praktyce, a ja pracuję w kryptowalutach.
@madargon

timorl boosted

@lukaso666 Nie jej wina, taki system że wszyscy podpisują z automatu, a ona musi to potem masowo wpisywać. Wręcz dobrze o niej świadczy że się stara by na pewno nie wpisać kogoś niechętnego. @kuba

@wizzwizz4 I wish this was only programmers... People who actually know what they are doing are pretty rare in general, and for a project to be well handled you need quite a high proportion of them. Plus we have pretty strong economic incentives to do stuff quick & dirty...

It's all the more impressive that some projects actually end up decent.

just terrible 

@niplav He was against beans, so he probably did not support flicking them.

Show older
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.