[This post](astralcodexten.substack.com/p/) contains some very insightful interpretations and charts, and complements nicely [my recent toot about vs ](qoto.org/@tripu/10660695114736).

Some highlights in a 🧵 thread:

Follow

🔬 **Some notable exceptions to that global trend**:

In the 🇺🇸 , the influence of income has vanished, and support depends solely (and strongly!) on education (highly educated ↔ leftist).

In (epitome: 🇸🇪 ) it's the opposite: education became irrelevant, and political preference depends only on income (perhaps because they are wealthy, egalitarian countries?).

🇵🇹 hasn't changed like the other countries: there the Right is still supported mostly by educated (and rich) voters. (NB: in the 50's and 60's, Portugal was a dictatorship).

🇮🇹 is the rare case where leftist parties ended up being the parties of the _richest_ segment of the population. I wouldn't read too much into this, though, as the political landscape there during the last decade or two has been a populist mess.

🇪🇸 is the country where education and income tell you _the least_ about political preferences! There's still the secular correlation “high income ↔ right wing”, but it's very weak today. (NB: in the 50's and 60's, Spain was also a dictatorship).

@tripu

To be fair, most USA capital winners are technology based. An individual can currently pull in a quarter million a year with the right skills, over such a rate being exclusive to people with strong social connections.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.