@heydon It’s anti-Enlightenment and that means they want to stay in the dark. It’s bizarre to me that people are against learning and introspection.
Don't you think it's a definitional issue? “Woke” means different things to different people.
Many of us were pro awareness, knowledge, understanding, Enlightenment, learning and introspection before 2008 — and still are today. It's unfair to presume so much malice or ignorance of so many people just because we oppose a specific, very politicised label.
Not at all. I appreciate politics and I have opinions. I am not “woke” because I don't agree with many ideas or actions that are associated with that label (and those to me determine the actual meaning of the word). All the nice things you mentioned (knowledge, learning, etc) are orthogonal to the #woke / anti-woke axis.
I'm sceptical, because I've read and heard from #woke people _themselves_, and still I found myself disagreeing strongly with their interpretation of things and their proposed policies.
But OK, I'm open to what you say.
What is “woke” to you, then? The definition has to be specific and actionable — ie, not a synonym for abstract ideas such as “nice”, “fair” or “reasonable”, because the vast majority of humans agree with all that already.
Your original toot says that being anti woke is “being anti awareness/knowledge/understanding”. So I interpret that being woke to you means “being in favour of awareness/knowledge/understanding”. I don't know a single person who is against those abstract ideas. Almost everyone would be woke, even if they reject the label (like me).
Congratulations, you have a useless word.
That's why I suggested “specific and actionable”.
/cc @yatil
@tripu @yatil thank fuck