Follow

and the are descriptive, not prescriptive, observations.

Things stick around for lots of reasons, good and bad — including, but not limited to: coercion, fear, inertia, ossification, taboo, chance, network effects, market failures, sunk costs…

Lots of wrong ideas, unhealthy habits and abhorrent behaviours are “old”.

Old ≠ good.

(, you're next)

Why do I trust the literary canon and the classics, then?

* Not just old but considered best by experts (literary critics, historians, artists, philosophers, writers themselves).
* Survived not among a handful of alternatives, but among _millions_ of other books, the vast majority lost and forgotten (ie plenty of variety and competition).
* To an extent, in art “consumed and appreciated by more” correlates with “quality” (by definition, because art should be liked by people).
* Today, definitely not propped by trends, intimidation, inertia, or consumerism (quite the contrary).

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.