Musk’s reign at Twitter has increased risks to users—especially those in crisis zones around the world who flocked to Twitter for expression during unrest—by unraveling guardrails against misinformation, harassment, and censorship. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/11/twitters-monetizable-users-not-human-rights-matter-most-under-musks-rein-leaving
@eff He's banning fewer people. I don't think you can seriously say that's a threat to human rights.
@valleyforge @eff when you remove the railguards by allowing ill-minded players free reign, than you reduce, not increase, rights overall. If you let anyone who says they're a doctor to practice medicine, you reduce, not increase, good health outcomes. Valley Forge is famous because the rag-tag troops finally got trained by von Steuben into a deadly army during a brutal winter in Revolutionary America. Discipline increases favorable outcomes.
@SeaGoatGirl @eff Impersonating a doctor is illegal. Twitter was banning people for expressing opinions they didn't like.
