This is a win! The judge issued a finding of fact that #Trump incited in an #insurrection against the United States. Full stop.

I think she chickened out of removing him from the ballot out of fear of violence against her family, a theory that I've yet to hear any pundit suggest. But in this age of Trump-fomented #PoliticalViolence, that's a very likely cause for her not ruling 100% against Trump, only 95%. I expect the other 5% on appeal.
thehill.com/regulation/court-b

Nailed it! I correctly predicted that the #ColoradoSupremeCourt would grant the remaining 5% needed to keep #Trump off the ballot.

The lower court's finding of fact that Trump engaged in #insurrection was the durable key. The lower court chickened out on the disqualification question, but the Colorado Supreme Court didn't, and neither should #SCOTUS.

@ArtSmart The problem is that we can tell that the finding of fact was wrong since it relied on a timeline that was not legal.

The court is gaslighting us.

Follow

@ArtSmart well if nothing else the court cited an election that hadn't yet happened in the timeline it laid out.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.