"AI art is art" - sure Jan.
You can't claim ownership on it. This is like saying "That Picasso I own is my physical property, therefore I made the art and deserve the credit for making it."
But then also without the "physical possession" aspect.
@MuseumJoe Art requires intention, anyways, to convey some meaning. It's more than simply looking pretty.
Generative slop lacks that intent.
Follow
@trekkie1701c I don't think that's right.
People see meaning in random things all the time. Randomness conveys meaning because it's what we take away from it. And if randomness can convey meaning art is no more constrained by the context of the producer.
It's not witchcraft. It's not like supernatural effects bind with the material.
We should not so constrain art.
