"AI art is art" - sure Jan.
You can't claim ownership on it. This is like saying "That Picasso I own is my physical property, therefore I made the art and deserve the credit for making it."
But then also without the "physical possession" aspect.
Follow
The analogy breaks down when considering AI to be like the paintbrush or other implement used to make the piece, not the human only indirectly involved in the claim.
So it's like saying Picasso can't claim the piece because the paint was laid down by a brush. It should therefore only belong to the brush.
