Built-in soft deletes are one of the reasons I like XTDB
---
RT @xtdb_com
news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3

"life when you don't have bitemporality" - @malcolmsparks


twitter.com/xtdb_com/status/15

@worldsendless isn't that an artifact of them using an immutable ledger

@icedquinn Yep. A beautiful artifact of immutability. I have never seen them market that fact, but as someone who has gone to pains to implement soft-deletes in half a dozen PostGres systems after wishing we had it, this default with XTDB is nice.

@worldsendless the concept of files that grow forever give me issues. :cirno_help:

@icedquinn Yeah, I totally get that. But it seems like space concerns are going we way of hierarchical directory structures; that is, kids these days don't know anything about them.

@worldsendless you can avoid this with a "fractal cascade," ex. every thousand entries is put in a sub-chain (which in turn every thousand entries in that is a sub-sub-chain) which means the amount of data required to be stored grows significantly slower.

i'm not aware of anyone who does it though.
Follow

@icedquinn The idea being that you are only ever dealing with a smaller piece of the blockchain, rather than all of it?

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.