No. Fuck you Snopes. Your site is continually full of bullshit. Anyone who donates to either Snopes or Wikipedia is a god damn fool. The Internet would evolve better tools if both of these pieces of shit went away.

@djsumdog Wikipedia has high quality good content and is relatively not biased (it is sometimes bias).

Snopes on the other hand is a bias piece of shit.

@freemo @djsumdog Wikipedia puts a message into any vessel that can hold one. It's difficult to do for articles like "Identification of alkaline earth cations," but they would if they could.

@natsock
@djsumdog

Maybe if you want to consider settled facts stated as fact as being a "bias" sure. ::shrug::

@freemo @natsock @djsumdog """settled facts"""

@Eris

Uh oh, we got the flat earther joining the conversation :) lol.. or do you agree that the earth being round is a settled fact?

@djsumdog @natsock

@freemo @djsumdog @natsock what the fuck is a settled fact

@Eris

It is things like "the earth is round"... something that has such an overwhelming amount of evidence proving it to be the case that you can pretty much not bother to put any energy into the topic unless someone has extraordinary evidence.

@djsumdog @natsock

@freemo
Can someone be a dissident to a scientific institution without being as divergent as a flat-earther?

@Eris @djsumdog

@natsock

Every idea that the scientific community adopts started out a fringe idea. Happens all the time.

@djsumdog @Eris

@freemo @natsock @djsumdog @Eris

It's a settled fact that niggers have a lower IQ on average than Whites by a full standard deviation. Do you accept this settled fact, or are you a Creationist who denies evolution?

@DK_Dharmaraj
This is a great example of gatekeeping. Anything that directly butts heads with the political motives of the community will be discarded as "bad science" and there no process through that.

@freemo @Eris @djsumdog

@natsock

Do you have an example of after him being labeled a racist journals refusing to take his publicans or peer-review submissions?

@djsumdog @Eris @DK_Dharmaraj

@freemo
Let's stop with that. The AAPA is not going to all smack their foreheads and concede to racism. Their constituents are not interested in research that contravenes their values, which they are allowed to keep because they are entirely in tune with the political zeitgeist.

https://physanth.org/about/position-statements/aapa-statement-race-and-racism-2019/

@djsumdog @Eris @DK_Dharmaraj

@natsock

So no then, thanks.

@djsumdog @Eris @DK_Dharmaraj