Personal attacks for bridging Bluesky + shrugging off Friendica, Hubzilla and (streams) = hypocrisy; CW: long (almost 2,000 characters), Fediverse meta, non-Mastodon Fediverse meta, Bluesky bridge meta
@jupiter_rowland Hi Jupiter. I learn new stuff each time i read your posts, it seems, but here i'm quite struggling. I seem to be entirely ignorant of most of the things you've mentioned above.
"the BridgyFed drama" ... 🤷♀️
"Mastodon users to want Friendica, Hubzilla and (streams) out of the Fediverse" ... they do? OMZ! Why? I mean, yes i read & understand all your points about our formatting & character limits, but i had no idea this was causing some adverse Masto user conflict 😮
"aren't based on ActivityPub" ... OMZ, i nearly fell over at this one. I thought everything in the fediverse was predicated on this, in that that was how the fediverse was even a thing. Geez i am so ignorant. 🤦♀️
"Friendica is already fully federated with Bluesky" ... oh, well, this one i do dislike. Now i need to research how i can block #Bluesky; i really want nothing to do with it, nor #Threads.
"allegedly "hate-fuelling" Fediverse News is a public group account on Friendica" ... sigh. I simply don't understand how i am so unaware. I am active each day in my account, yet somehow remain cluelessly obliviously ignorant of nuclear wars raging around me. Sigh.
@scott Hello Scott, t/y muchly for taking the time to explain that helpfully for me. 🤗 At the risk of appearing even more stupid...
"building a bridge between ActivityPub and AT Protocol" ... yes i had heard of that, but til now had been naively unaware of all the Sturm und Drang this is apparently generating, eg... "so angry that they are flipping out and dropping F bombs" --> to the extent that i am doing my several hours of daily fediversing, i spend all that time in my Home timeline, not in the local server nor global timelines, & in my Home i follow a very large number of #hashtags, + a smaller but not negligible number of accounts. Clearly an unintended by-product of my curation has been to insulate me almost entirely from these apparent "range wars" raging beyond my purview.
You listed #Friendica twice, ie, in both of the "protocol camps". Is that a typo, or deliberate? If the latter, it might explain & resolve my confusion when reading Jupiter's OP, given somehow i had been thinking that Friendica is using AP.
"Scuttlebutt" ... i love this, & shall now immediately begin searching for suitable instances i can join! 😜
"far as Friendica federating with Bluesky, the administrator of the server would have to activate that" ... yes, that's exactly as i hoped it would be, which is why before, & again now, i have cc'd @alfred
Thanks again.
And there was a lot of ignorance about how the fediverse actually works (i.e. most didn't know that their posts are already federated beyond Mastodon).
"even those who aren't connected to anyone on Bluesky."
Well... yeah, like, that's precisely why the dev was saying that opt-out is better for their project than asking people to opt-in.
To illustrate. Bluesky account is "followed" by a masto account. I use quotes because the masto account wouldn't really be directly following the Bluesky account, they'd be following an activitypub account spawned on the ActivityPub 'bridge server' that mirrors the Bluesky account's posts, and IIRC also mirrors their replies, likes, quote posts, etc.
Right there the masto account is already seeing more Bluesky stuff than just the person they followed. Now do the reverse. Bluesky account follows AP account. To the AP user, it's just another AP follower. But now all their public posts, replies, etc are being mirrored on a Bluesky server via a spawned account.
Ok, now consider a slightly different situation: what happens when an AP user replies to a post from a mirrored Bluesky account?
If the dev's description of their own project is to be believed, those replies will be sent to that user on Bluesky. How? Well, I'd assume they'd need to spawn a Bluesky account to mirror that AP user's account. And I don't even think the reply needs to be directly to the Bluesky user - it could be a reply to a post by a masto account that is followed by a Bluesky user. This isn't me just purely guessing - I'm drawing logical conclusions based on what the dev has written on their blog, and what they talked about as a guest on the wedistribute podcast.
Anyway: do you see it now? This quickly turns into a huge number of mirror accounts - including of people who might never have directly interacted with a mirrored Bluesky account - having their posts fed into another platform's servers, entirely for the benefit of a for-profit corporation to put into their users' algorithmic feeds, and for the personal glory of this dev who fully admits they expected this response.
@smallpatatas @scott
Where is that podcast episode exactly and preferably at which time mentioned to what you mean mostly? (although I will listen to it all more than once)
Decentralisation dicussion / "Decentered" podcast...
█3rd Podcast: This one mentions BlueSky, Nostr
https://wedistribute.org/podcast/bridgyfed-ryan-barrett/
7.40mins Bridge described about
I'm kind of just gluing things together as engineer... not really with any big principles
█1st podcast- Fediverse mentioned
https://wedistribute.org/podcast/decentered-s1e1-creation-and-discovery/
● ...the news account is here to follow...
@news
● ...different to other accounts similar...
We Distribute
@wedistribute /
https://mozilla.social/@wedistribute
We Distribute Media /
@wedistributemedia / https://spectra.video/accounts/wedistributemedia
@freeschool
Most recent(?) episode of the Decentered podcast from WeDistribute. Relevant bit is short, and is right around the 5 min mark.
@scott