What Operating System do you use?
(If Linux or BSD then which distros?)
@mur2501 Debian on the server, Arch on the desktop
@mur2501 шindoшs
@borrof
Use https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astra_Linux Comrade or DIE
@mur2501 Manjaro 😁
@mur2501 POP_OS
@mur2501 Arch Linux
@mur2501
Archlinux
@mur2501
Desktop/Laptop: Ubuntu, sometimes Debian
Servers: Debian, might try FreeBSD for a file server soon
Firewall: OpenBSD
@mur2501 Fedora
@foreverxml
I saw in a review site that it is filled with problems and messy design
@mur2501 For me it isn't. I use Workstation Edition 34 and it's pretty smooth and nice.
@mur2501 Debian, Ubuntu, FreeBSD.
@tirifto
Well that's Linux, Gnu projects build it's OS upon the Linux kernel.
Parabola is derived from Arch.
@mur2501 Bunsenlabs/Debian
@lbehm
Do you know how to install Bunsenlabs alongside windows?
@mur2501 Never tried it. Is there a problem?
@mur2501 Linux Mint 19.3 (Cinnamon)
@mur2501 Fedora, Raspberry Pi OS
@mur2501 Gentoo
@mur2501 Ubuntu, Ubuntu-Mate, Openmediavault
@mur2501 @kranfahrer missing Unix/Solaris
@schenklklopfer @kranfahrer
Only have 4 options max in the poll so can't list the rarer ones. Thought that shall not stop for someone to point out 🙂
So how's your experience with Solaris and how you compare it to others?
Using OpenIndiana on several storage servers with ZFS for NFS and SMB. Hosting about one PetaByte of data on those systems.
I think Linux can do this job as well but only the recent versions. As I started doing this - 10 years ago - there was no option for ZFSonLinux...
Ever tried to host over 500.000 files in one folder on NTFS on Windows and share it via SMB?
Well Windows sucks^^
@schenklklopfer @kranfahrer
I would love to know more about handling very large amount of data and the effects of different Operating Systems and File systems on it
Basically it is not that different than smaller amount of data.
With the difference that you have way more hardware...
So you can do everything as it is on a smaller environment.
The magic starts at the point you want to have a good performance. You need several tounsands of IOPS and so on.
Than you need to do very heavy optimization on every peace of hard- and software. That's where ZFS and Solaris comes from...
@mur2501 Manjaro KDE
@mur2501 Manjaro and openSUSE
@mur2501 Debian for my work's laptop, Arch for my personal computer, and Raspbian OS running on a Pi for my media center.
@mur2501 I'm using openSUSE
@mur2501 Ubuntu for work and server, Arch for personal stuff
@mur2501 Linux > Fedora it is
@rarepublic
So you are a bleeding Edge technology distro lover
@mur2501 Well, bleeding-edge was no real priority for me. Though it's nice to have. And Fedora ships - at least for me - with the nicest balance between bleeding-edge and stable. Fedora 34 with Pipewire and Wayland is working like a charm. The fact that the stuff is bleeding-edge is a only a nice-to-have. The thing I care about is reliability. And I swear 5 years of Distrohopping, and I have not found a single distro that stable. So for me, Fedora = non-plus-ultra <3
@rarepublic
By the way try Solus Budgie too and give a review :3
@mur2501 Manjaro on desktop, Arch on laptop, Ubuntu/Debian on servers
@mur2501 @dsw28 openSUSE Leap & Tumbleweed (on my new @tuxedocomputers )
@mur2501 i am currently copeing.
Servers: Ubuntu (for now)
Desktop: Win10/Fedora KDE
Laptop: Fedora KDE
Work-PC: Ubuntu
@mur2501 arch :3