I’m surprised this video wasn’t automatically deleted upon upload. Watch it now while you still can:
Liberal Hypocrisy is Fueling American Inequality
@professortom I like the self-examination aspect of this video- acknowledging the disconnect between people who vote for liberal candidates and people who support liberal policies. It's a difference of "sounding good" vs. "doing good". That being said, buying a home is a way for average people to build some wealth and adding multi-family housing into those neighborhoods CAN potentially lower property values- especially rentals.
@pamby1 I agree that multi-family housing can devalue property. But if there’s a housing shortage and no one wants multi-housing built in their backyards, the end result is mass homelessness.
What I thought the video did a good job of pointing out is that those who claim they believe in helping those of lower socio-economic status are not willing to sacrifice even just a little (multi-family won’t drive costs to $0) in order to achieve their stated goal of a more equatable world.
What this video points out is the naïveté of the video makers. One (amongst many) reason many people vote Republican is because of the very things mentioned in this video. The Democrat party is filled with grifter politicians.
@sigma Repubs aren't innocent either, but I agree with your point. We need MAGA candidates, imo. The rest need to go.
@professortom Yes please- at least Desantises. I don't know enough about Walker.🤷♀️
I agree with the principled nature of Walker. But since the appearance of Trump, it's apparent we need more 'in your face' politicians.
@sigma I definitely agree with that. I believe the majority of Americans have had a "live and let live" attitude that has not served us well in terms of keeping our country from the situation we're in now. President Trump had the right policy combination to appeal to the majority of Americans- as evidenced by his increase of 11,000,000 voters across ALL demographics- AND the right temperament to fight for it. We got a taste of our potential as a country while PT was in office.
So if he gets back in, will the US reverse the policy on Coal and fossil fuels, and start burning coal again despite pledges and the known effects on global warming of burning coal. ?
@zleap The only thing I will say about "global warming" is that it is a political agenda, just like covid has become, that is ANTI- science and where there is ONE accepted narrative and dissenting arguments about how much of a threat either is, is silenced. Until all arguments are considered about both, I'm ignoring both as a SERIOUS threat.
1) Coal is not going away (even under Dem admins) because it's fueling most power plants and Teslas. Natural gas is clean and usable alternative given the availability.
2) Pam is correct. "Global Warming/Climate Change is a political agenda that Dems are not willing to respect. Just look at Obama's house and Pelosi's new house.
3) We are in a cold historic global temperature period.
In some ways I also feel this is being weaponised by people, it is as if older people are causing the issue, we are trying to do the right thing, recycle more etc.
I did write to Lidl UK a while back to ask about them using alternatives to plastic to wrap drinks cans for example.
They do have a plan for this, so to me writing to companies and asking a question, suggesting ideas is far more useful than blocking motorways for example.
People are not going to listen to people like Greta Thunberg if they feel she is just going to attack them for everything they try and do.