Supreme Court will decide on First Amendment protections for social media.
The court has the opportunity to reexamine the nature of content moderation and the constitutional limitations of the government regarding speech on platforms such as Facebook, X, TikTok, and Instagram.
https://chicago.suntimes.com/2023/11/28/23977943/first-amendment-free-speech-social-media-facebook-tiktok-instagram-x-supreme-court-the-conversation
#SocialMedia #SCOTUS #FirstAmendment #FreeSpeech #Moderation #Technology #Legal
@RonaldTooTall That is a terrible article. The first sentence is just blatantly wrong.
@rabbitt @RonaldTooTall Well, no, they have the right to do whatever they want with posts because users agreed to that before choosing to put their speech on the company's private property in the first place.
But 1A absolutely protects messages on social media platforms. The government can't suddenly punish people for their speech just because they wrote it on social media.
@rabbitt @RonaldTooTall Of course they will. That's been set as precedent for years now. It's how the law is written. And it's consistent with 1A jurisprudence overall.
@LouisIngenthron @RonaldTooTall
I think we get confused about the generic term “social media”, thinking it means PUBLIC media when in reality it has always been private media that manipulates and controls what is viewed. The federated platform that Mastodon uses operates more like a true “public” platform. How SCOTUS rules on this is still up in the air, but my guess is that they will rule that private companies will continue to have discretion about screening posts.