Supreme Court will decide on First Amendment protections for social media.
The court has the opportunity to reexamine the nature of content moderation and the constitutional limitations of the government regarding speech on platforms such as Facebook, X, TikTok, and Instagram.
https://chicago.suntimes.com/2023/11/28/23977943/first-amendment-free-speech-social-media-facebook-tiktok-instagram-x-supreme-court-the-conversation
#SocialMedia #SCOTUS #FirstAmendment #FreeSpeech #Moderation #Technology #Legal
@RonaldTooTall That is a terrible article. The first sentence is just blatantly wrong.
@LouisIngenthron @RonaldTooTall
On the contrary, the first sentence is correct as to previous interpretations. Because META, X, etc. are privately owned, they have the power to do whatever they wish with posts. However, if the forum was an official government platform, then the rules must change to allow everyone to post their views. What needs to be clarified is whether a political entity can claim to have an “official” website on a private platform!
@rabbitt @RonaldTooTall Well, no, they have the right to do whatever they want with posts because users agreed to that before choosing to put their speech on the company's private property in the first place.
But 1A absolutely protects messages on social media platforms. The government can't suddenly punish people for their speech just because they wrote it on social media.
@rabbitt @RonaldTooTall Of course they will. That's been set as precedent for years now. It's how the law is written. And it's consistent with 1A jurisprudence overall.