bonifartius 𒂼𒄄 @bonifartius@social.cleverlibre.org

Women were more than just homemakers traditionally.

In family business the wife would do the books while the husband ran the shop floor. In agriculture the wife and husband work in partnership.

There was also a lot of social capital they were responsible for in the community such as church, sporting and voluntary organizations.

@TheVeryLutheranHousewife

I don't think that's really true. I think there's a lot that women should be doing in their communities which isn't part of homemaking - even the Proverbial ideal woman runs a small business and manages her money wisely. There's also community groups, charity work, etc, and many professions such as nursing which are extremely well suited to female qualities. Women partially funded the creation of the Bible, women were witnesses to the gospel, women have powerful and important roles to play in churches, communities and societies.

Pretending that women should be continually birthing from 18 to 50 and then crawl into a hole and die once their uterus has passed its expiry date is not doing anything to move people past the anti-woman image of the right.

@Aether

Tradition didn't rob women of their importance in society, industrialization did.

@TinyFern @TheVeryLutheranHousewife

@FriarQuazar "I ate all the Slack" - Fat Bob

Gen-X has something to say about the Web and marxism.

1. All politics imply violence. That's what it's about: to what end and who gets to apply it, to whom, and in what form and measure. Even the most progressive ideologies imply violence somewhere down the line. The more inderect it is, the further down the line it is, and behind more layers of red tape and buerocratic gridlocks it is, the more "humane" the political system *appears*. But it will always be there, lest everything collapses.
2. You can't escape politics. It is the game you can't leave, even if you died. You live and breathe it. Like air fills everything there is empty space, politics is where societh or ita influence is. You can only turn a blind eye to it. Apolitical is an escapist fantasy. And there's nothing wrong about a little escapism every now and then, in fact, it's healthy. As long as you know that the reality will always catch up with you. And it will.

@hector you see the new normal is new because it's not normal

nothing to see here, Just a nation entirely removing itself from the internet... I'm sure nothing bad is going on there at all.

/s

#^Checkliste zur qualifizierten Beurteilung des Gefährdungs­potenzials von Sekten und Psychogruppen

Woran kann ich unseriöse Angebote auf dem Psychomarkt erkennen?

Die sogenannte Sekte oder Psychogruppe verspricht, die Welt bzw. den Einzelnen (mit mRNA-Impfungen) erlösen zu können bzw. zu verändern oder einfach auf den richtigen Weg zu bringen. Mit diesen Versprechungen gewinnt sie neue Mitglieder und hält die bisherigen bei der Stange (für die Booster-Impfungen).
Die ... engagierte Überzeugungsarbeit für großartige Weltverbesserungs- oder Rettungspläne (Impfen die Gesellschaft zurück in die Freiheit) bis hin zu einschüchternden Warnungen vor irdischen (Virusvarianten) oder kosmischen Katastrophen oder ewiger Verdammnis. Versprochen werden Rundumlösungen (durch die Impfprogramme) im Sinne eines rettenden Rezepts. Es wird die (Impfung als) Lösung für alle Fragen und persönlichen Probleme angeboten.
Es geht darum, ein unglaubliches Ziel zu erreichen (Durchimpfung der ganzen Welt) oder ein schreckliches Menschheitsdrama (Corona-Pandemie wegen Impfskeptiker) zu überleben. Dem Einzelnen wird versprochen, dass er als (geimpftes) Mitglied dieser (Impf)-Sekte den Weltuntergang heil überstehen werde. Es werden Sehnsüchte angesprochen und andererseits Ängste mobilisiert, auf die dann mit passenden Versprechungen reagiert wird. Idealistisch klingende, utopische und wunderartige Lösungen werden aufgezeigt. Die religiöse Gemeinschaft behauptet, dass sie als einzige die totale Errettung bzw. Erlösung für eine absehbare Zukunft noch in diesem Leben oder nach dem Tod bieten kann.

the incels were created by leftism

leftism thinks that the small guy, the inadequate, can win

when they realise that this is the exception, not the rule, they get infuriated because they were lied to, so they switch sides completely.

it would cause far less trouble if you let kids on to the fact that yes, the chad mostly wins, and while this may not be fair, that’s what generally happens.

you can take up battle against the chad. maybe you’ll win, but it’s unlikely.

i think this would cause less bitterness. you didn’t light up the spirits of people who didn’t have a realistic chance of winning.

as for me?

i’m here to fight. not against chads in particular. just to fight to stay afloat, really.

true chads aren’t destructive. true chads try to help out. a chad isn’t the person at the gym that makes fun of you for being fat. a true chad is the guy who sees that a new guy is in need of help and support.

and i’m not a gym chad.

but i’m a brain chad. shoot me for saying it, but my general approach is to guide toward less self-harm. to support and guide. anything else isn’t constructive.

Las gerade von jemanden: 3x geimpft, #PCR positiv. Daher kommen die hohen Inzidenzen, wird nur verschwiegen.

Gebt endlich zu, dass #BioNTech & Co. großer Mist sind, die zudem über ihre eindimensionale Wirkweise gegen ein einziges #COVID Protein #Omikron geradezu förderten.