what’s next [after the equality act]? racial identity? can someone identify as a minority [for benefits]? i mean we’ve already seen it happen — David Freiheit
🇳🇱
@icedquinn Personally I think we are going about it backwards.. we shouldnt be treating women, or minorities as special groups or give them special treatment (regardless of if they face unique challenges), therefore problem solved, be a minority if you want, who cares.
That isnt that there is no problem or that the problem isnt to be solved. But if we solve the problem for all poor, for example, then by extension we are already helping challenged groups (who are more likely to be poor) as a result.
it's not "men's sports" and "women's sports," they are "sports leagues" and "women's leagues" for the reason of you have potentially 300m citizens in the USA and there are maybe <100 slots to put in the sports league.
the womens leagues are a concession so they can play sports at all.
this is why the whole 'no trans in womens sports' is a big deal.
You wouldnt.. transexuals and transgendered people do not want their own bathrooms or an elimination of sports leagues all together.. They want to be included, not to have other excluded.
I wonder if you realize how pathetic you look when you talk like that.. probably not. You sound like a nut job who is so messed up and miserable all they have left in life is to try to troll random strangers they dont know and hope someone for once will at least acknowledge you...
get a life.
I remember a few people adding some good points and then a bunch of morons who cared more about some religious or obnoxious agenda and prejudice than facts.
I dont remember which one you were, so likely didnt say anything new or remarkable
Also that conversation and post was not about primary sex characteristics, it was about sex, as a whole.
Must be great living in a world that is that simple.. wish it were more than a fantasy, would make my job much easier.
this is a pretty good breakdown of the progressive libtard criteria for intersex. true intersex is actually far less common than progressives claim
https://colinwright.substack.com/p/intersex-is-not-as-common-as-red
"true intersex"... lol your literally pulling the no true scotsman fallacy right now. I love how you just get to dictate what "true intersex" is and all of science and professionals who life is devoted to this stuff be damned.
Move along your wasting my time.
primary sex determination in humans happens at conception. this applies in 99.9% of cases:
the egg has an X
if the sperm has a Y, baby is male
if the sperm has an X baby is female
No one said anything about "primary sex", on the previous post and this one I never once even used the word primary... so not sure what your on about.
i said "primay sex determination"
that's what determines whether you're male or female, which is the thing you libtards cant seem to get through your thick heads
Ok well considering you clearly have no clue what your talking about (and said several incorrect statements already).. and have the maturity of a toddler, I can see why I dont remember you and why you arent worth my attention, bye.
your the only one in the room saying anything worthy of listening to.. you have more credentials than most of the schmucks on this thread.
If you wanted to have that conversation you should have considered it before having the maturity of a 2 year old.
I said good bye, next step is muting you. I wont engage with people who dont engage respectfully, it isnt worth my time. Your complete lack of credentials is secondary to that and would not effect if i wanted to engage you or not usually.
bye, go curl up in a ball and cry yourself to sleep
you should stick to computer science or whatever you're supposedly an expert at. you're talking out your ass as usual
Actually biology is one of the fields I have a degree in, and I worked on the human genome project and other projects in the field (most the genetics side).. though I would not really call myself a biologist either. But I do have more than enough credentials and professional expiernce in the field to understand the topic.
What were your credentials, I dont recall, like i said I dont even remember you saying anything in the past on this topic particularly insightful or meaningful so I dont recall much about your expertise.
I dont care about the letters after your name, I care about what skills you have proven yourself to have. That can be in the form of published scientic articles, peer-review, recognition of accomplishments by professionals, or involvement as a member of a project in the field... credentials are a lot more than some letters.
I am literally asking you "have you accomplished anything in your life to show you have expertise in this topic"... sounds like your answer is no then
emojis after referencing the cathedral.
Especially in the soft sciences...though if you try to make up shit in STEM they throw you out (though only when it becomes an embarrassment)
True that... mathematics is really the epitome of the cathedral...
Ahh right all of science is a big conspiracy and lie.. only the science you made up and pulled our of your ass is the real science.. makes so much sense now...
Yea im muting you now, you have no value to add to any conversation.
Everyone wants to discover something new and unintuitive, so validating someone else's finding is a rare sight, and the confirmation bias is real.
Not to mention that intuition, being a product of millions of years of evolution, isn't often wrong, so when you see a study with some fantastic find that seems too good to be true... it isn't true.
The system isnt perfect and yes there are biases, its fine to be critical and not treat a published study as god and truth... no issues there.. But when you assume all studies are crap, even ones where there is complete consensus, and you do so with no evidence or expeirnce of your own, then your just foolish in the other direction.
As you said, its the best system we have so far, and while anti-science is coming up with nonsense like a 4000 year old earth, and the world being flat science is still right far more often than the alternative.
It really just comes down to understanding where the line is between reality and fringe science that **may** be true but has a lot of unknowns.
the existence of "gender" and the idea of sex being fluid (and racial and sexual "equality" for that matter) are just as nonsensical as the 4000 year old earth but people who supposedly believe in "science" believe in them.
"If you believe that there is a replication crisis in academia that leads to legitimate distrust in academic credentialism then you must also believe the Earth is flat"
👍 👍 👍
even not meeting these criteria does not mean a person is not male or female. you can have erectile dysfunction and be male. you can be infertile and be female.
When you try to play gymnastics to justify this clown world shit it just reveals how you've been forced to hold this fence-sitting position for fear that you will be professionally destroyed if you approached this with any real reasoning or logic. You are a hypocrite and your entire "profession" has been rendered a laughable joke. You're the doctors who denied germ theory out of fear and cargo cultist group-think. You're a slave to the cult, a domesticated pleb for the cathedral.
Sorry, I really have no interest in reading anything you have to say that doesnt start with an apology at this point.. waste energy on replying all you want but be warned ill mostly just read a word or two, roll my eyes, and move on. Not because of your opinions, but because of the pathetic way you express them.
wow you must really be a horribly broken person if your so desperate for confirmation your still talking even when you know what you are saying isnt even being red... sad, very sad.
I hope you find some happiness one day and get past your issues.
going to mute you for 24 hours just so i dont accidentally read something you say, have fun chatting away with me, clearly you dont need me for the conversation.
@freemo @crunklord420 @icedquinn @meowski
