Oh no, I said something I realized was wrong and deleted it so I dont put wrong information out there.. how horrible of me.
The day someone creates nuclear power without using science then maybe I will take you seriously.
It shows science clearly isnt as inept or constantly wrong as you imply if it gives rise to highly advanced and complex technologies that have huge impacts for society.. things flat earthers and science deniers could never hope to produce or even approach.
Of course science, as it is shown to the public, is politicized and often wrong. The media in generally is horribly biased and anti-factual, that includes both liberal and conservative media (no media seems impartial in the USA).
There is a big difference between the actual science, and the science the general public thinks is science, which is largely just a narrative trying to use science to sell it.
That said your specific examples are completely incorrect.. climate change **is** real, though you wont get even a basic understanding of why by either side of the media, for example.
Yes I can agree with that. While climate change is serious and acting over short periods, it is often overhyped to induce fear as well.
Are you seriously complaining about the fact that languages change over time... Yea I'm pretty upset we dont still speak latin too ::rolls eyes::
The scientific **method** is a method for doing things.. science is not the scientific method, which is only a set of principles that exists within natural sciences as a process for doing experimentation.
How would you even apply the scientific method to a math proof?
Honestly im done here, its one thing that your an idiot, it is another that your an idiot who doesnt know it.
muted