Show newer

@ech @TruthSandwich

My thoughts exactly.. but he did explain it. He seems to be of the opiunion his intention is to loose the primary and then call foul on a rigged election. According to Truth he thinks this will potentially have an effect on the presidential election.... I dont think I agree though.

@realcaseyrollins

I think id have to go with smart and attractive.

Ive never dated anyone who wasnt attractive simply because i probably wouldnt develop any initial interest if that wasnt there. It is after all the first thing that one can see.

That said they certainly werent all smart and sane either... many were smart, some were sane, but not as many.

What is your favorite kind of bee?

@realcaseyrollins

Dumb is the harder for me to deal with in a relationship, though it wouldnt effect friendships too much. My biggest turn on is a good conversation.. getting excited to talk to someone... hard to have that with a dumb person, especially for someone as technical as myself.

@realcaseyrollins

Them nordic woman, lol. I dated a good deal in the Netherlands..Wonderful women, beautiful, tall, down to earth, well rounded... quite amazing in many ways.. but they also know their worth :)

@thor

@realcaseyrollins Hahaha thats the joke... Any women you will ever have will, at most, be 2 out of the 3 :)

You can pick 2

@thor In that case sounds like you need advice from Chris Hemsworth, not me :)

I was going to say there seems to be two ways to get more contacts... 1) check in on the app often, IIRC people who were more recently online are ranked higher 2) just swipe right on everyone till you max it out every day, then see who you match, and only respond to the ones you actually like.

I kinda dont recommend #2 just cause it might cause a lot of people to be sad... but im pretty sure its what everyone does, swipe first, consider post-match.

Have you tried being attractive? I heard once some ladies might go for that :)

@thor How often are you on the app? Im trying to think of reasons and advice I can give to heklp

@lowqualityfacts Wrong, all mothers are grand, and all those grand mothers are great!

reason.com/2023/09/19/federal-

"A federal judge has granted an injunction blocking a California law that would force online businesses and social media platforms to estimate the ages of people visiting their sites and protect children from seeing content that might cause harm, stating that the law likely violates the First Amendment and would likely lead to online government-fueled censorship."

@thor The ironic thing is this setup would cost them more on their electric bill than an AC in terms of the cost per degree.

@N3VEM if it werent for the fact that spec was changed after-the fact I might have agreed with you.. I call bs ont he good intent.

@shuttersparks What do you mean, merger of church and state is a fundamental principle for the founding fathers. It is even in our constitution!

@chris You can get that? I thought they stopped making them availbile?

@mk

yes, and earlier in the thread during the line of questioning i said ...

> Money is part of the conversation, but money is not wealth.. first you need to understand how wealth is generated and what it even means. Then we can tie it back into money

So i made quite clear the intent was to tie it back to money, and thus needs to be quantified for that line of conversation.

Here we arent trying to talk about how we measure that wealth in dollars and cents. So thankfully for the moment there is no need to go into the level of complexity we did in our last conversation.

@icedquinn @realcaseyrollins

Show older
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.