Show newer

Welcome to the MATRIX <--- The Word Meaning... 

Noun: matrix (matrices, matrixes)

1. (mathematics) a rectangular array of quantities or expressions set out by rows and columns; treated as a single element and manipulated according to rules

2. (geology) a mass of fine-grained rock in which fossils, crystals, or gems are embedded

3. An enclosure within which something originates or develops

4. The body substance in which tissue cells are embedded

5. The formative tissue at the base of a nail

6. Mould used in the production of phonograph records, type, or other relief surface

Gaming version of how I feel about needing to engage in life (slowly or much more).... 

Gaming version of how I feel about needing to engage in life (slowly or much more) as the not engaging is basically a time-waster / time-lapse of the inevitable power struggle or dominance...

So while going gun-ho is not what I mean or suicide, it's about constant pressure and chipping away at the right things... which I see as ourselves more than structure or well-made Lose-Win where nobody really wins so we have to fight / shoot well amongst ourselves (engage)... else waste time... which is what is happening I believe if you don't talk to me basically without sounding full of myself but really there are little holes in my defence and basically you haven't played 'communication' perhaps to really know! (see my profile and answer partially else jump into chat with me and test the theory and consider it 'done' after - *no hidden alterer motives* other than saying / proving upfront we need to practice and therefore know more what we are doing aside from playing inside losing casinos and at least spend the time wisely with each other for more constructive outcomes)

@josipretrobits
Interesting intro for the BASIC version of Mandelbrot Set simplified
and 9.15 for actual pretty pixels in the making

Also non-advert version here:
invidious.snopyta.org/watch?v=

@Pat I don't know @Pat if you are playing an unsaid game here, With you it's been unclear humour (like: I'll say something random to get you to think about it in a different way) or just missing the point in a other type of reply... so this is my consideration with you at the moment. The last part of reply makes a bit of sense but it's like the first is off. Anyway... just for myself then:

This writing was about looking objectively. So putting aside your feelings and go for something else in learning.
This is not about racism itself but putting aside that so you can take from people measurably since they are measurably more participatory in more things (and quite sanely that can be looked at which you should measure yourself) and at least they are able to dissect, point out and reply... probably from being intelligent / practised in expressed / not fearing how they look.

... which compared to other people who are quite non-participatory people / just unresponsive / not-really-present internet people / just scared of others (or whatever else that I might respect a bit and say 'fair enough' to, still renders them total sheep and almost non-human practitioners...
Simply not really operating a human and even a minimum I see as responsible / learning or even 'getting there'.

I think I'm not going to spell too much out for you in further posts since this also might be a kind of joke or exploration - so take this all as a bonus effort be me, even if it's no fault of your own. And even re-read the first text. And then your reply.

Clever but racist people / clever users even with unwanted things... 

Clever but racist people - which still can win win in many ways in the realm of contact... because if you can get past racist things (not ignore but take the other measured points) then they WIN over those people are

- inexpressive (people who can't from lack of practice or lack of feeling sense in worth constructing any sense from it all.. and more reasons)

- they are measurably clever / more active / more connecting to other things 9even bad included is interesting and perhaps part of human nature with the anime prom or whatever)

- they are not scared (THIS IS ALMOST TOP OF THE LIST where you might have clever but silent people or clever but racist still-quite-correct-on-many-points people)

So while I want to say normal people are better for being less dangerous, actually it turns out over the internet or in real life passive people are perhaps most unuseful (notice I wanted to say useless but I want people to also have the right to do nothing for others in terms of free speech or building the mind even though I feel they might be ignorantly doing so... I think for a while is ok but not politically respecting one's self is a problem).

Will revise this if any major flaws- feel free to help or forever assume I'm not far off many correlating points. And also practising speech in case I'm wrong and happily can be pointed out how :) (....for example someone not talking / try vs. someone racists doing and trying while being quite logical in many other ways)

Do also remember when you see crap THAT IS PEOPLE ->meaning if you really asked people and their misconception you'd realise how far out they are and this is what bring it out has as advantage to silent kind of suffocation or allowance of bad things.

From time to time is does work to give these people and profile time rather than the same-same people (who for example don't even reply )

@bot Investing in something that isn’t a tangible resource or asset you have full ownership of is probably a very, very foolish idea.

Other people enable us to do more or help us learn more than our own limits... 

While at the same time people wouldn't know what to do with peace or the right people if they had all of it or enough.

One long lesson to learn it seems... and being satisfied is probably never enough... including my own learning which I think is measurably one of the best ways (improving the mindset, not just improving tech etc).

When people realise you can't escape politics, then we can begin

Consciousness... like Neo from the Matrix seeing himself as different versions... 

.Do you ever pause to think in between consciously which version you are or if you are doing something that you can consciously change what you're about to do and do it in a different way... Or will what you do just kind of be what is was going to be anyway?!

Interesting right? Try doing a doodle and then thinking, "what would I usually draw next?" and then maybe considering drawing the doodle differently to show you're able to be apply conscious change of that...

guess you have to be happy either way but also changing your normals is interesting or being the better you needs precision consciousness or a lot in one moment.

Wind-up fan using and manual hand crank mechanism... 

Made in Switzerland in the 1910s. The spring-loaded motor provides a breeze for 30 minutes.

They would never allow something this good because

- as a manually 'charged' product and pre-load technology

and because

- disposable energy sells better and sometimes needs less brain to operate than manually doing things :)

Obviously not for all application but imagine running on a treadmill and then having more-free power... I just thinks these sort of idea they wouldn't ever allow to compete with fuel.

invidious.tiekoetter.com/watch?v=ONj9cvHCado

or

redirect.invidious.io/watch?v=

YEWTU.BE = YOUTUBE + no adverts... 

@freeschool Yewtu.be is just one of the many Invidious instances.
There are other servers too : docs.invidious.io/Invidious-In
Invidious is also open source that can be self hosted.

Types of being alive - Physical and Mental well-being... 

Keeping people alive is not only physical... it is mental well-being too.

The peace of mind and mental security that your government is not preying on you for example... this is also a type of being alive / being happy which I think is hidden and is deliberately not worked on or funded by governments and banks, because everything else would have to fall into that alignment (I see the current alignment and 'efficiencies' cutting out what people think or simply leaving them alone!

When you don't understand try saying:
- "Could you say more so I can get a better idea what you mean?"
or
- Do you mean X or Y?" to then work out a yes / no and get more details from there.

Try above instead of just saying "I don't understand".

This way, even if X and Y are completely wrong, the other person explaining will have a better sense of where you are and can adjust their explanation.

A kind of triangulation as long as someone isn't offended that you assumed they were talking about it differently and said X or Y but checking / saying your guess does help see if you know what they are talking about.

If you can reduce petrol consumption you can reduce Imperial powers...

If you chase the tail ends of how things happen and the problems you see powerful resources, perhaps mainly you find Petrol or Oil comes up as root powers that allow for a lot of crap

So we became 'rich' using that and the less we us 'it' the better chance we have of evening the weight of 'privilege' / people stealing resources for us.

Equation
Less petrol consumption
= less power, less currency made
= slower abuse from petrol power / petro-dollar

Petroleum is one big thing ruling the world(s) and (1st World / 3rd world as they say) pushing down the smaller countries u$ing this as the driver to the average road user / plastic petroleum products.

Petroleum makes a tons of products - someone list them or even name their favourite!

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petroleu

Going back to modem speed might actually save people and planet.

...now that we've gone too fast.

How to manage voting / balancing people (e.g. 60% want one thing and 40% want another...?)

So doing nothing (neither) is sometimes an option but what if there is a threat / a time pressure / external force of some kind and you *need* to make a decision in a few days - how not to leave it too long with 60/40 balance for example?).

My quick thoughts:
Perhaps there isn't a way and that's why capitalism maintains hierarchy to make sure one can overrule another constantly until the top tier hierarchy gets what they want (and overrule it themself if really hierarchy isn't deciding well for them).

For coops / teams perhaps always an internal team has to make / dictate although the whole emotionally deep stuff I feel has to be sorted and can't be ignored constantly without human deprivation.

Money is Gambling Life

Just today I realised gambling is the usage of money itself (like poker chips)

Other stuff is mixed in (buying, paying, resource domination, currency domination, renting people or property, laws, tax, human rights etc, cheating accounts, corporate bias in bed with government etc)...

...but is distracting from the poker chips being a creation of 'the casino' or just those that invented their own currency or symbolic representation of real things (like bonds derived from other bonds which end up as just pieces of paper based on other pieces of paper lol !).

The might need re-writing but the first few short paragraphs WERE A HIT FOR SURE ON MY RADAR. I might just have it perfect after all these years of unfolding the onion skins while not summing too innocently this there isn't more levels of cheating.

Taken decade to even to name it.

I knew money isn't perfect but to making it a losing game by default is easy to see now.
Just so clear and root of every other unfairness it seems. Governments and Banks creating mathematical probability and %wins for government and banks is relying on human destruction for those people (silently chipping away at your chips).

More is extra / probably confusing (above is pure)

Your life IS actually using money.
I realised much more on the technical side you're almost at the casino table using money in this system... or it's a gradual degradation or high % which like give-give-give and big takes back by system (while losing rights).

So as well as so much mixed politics of all the users in the system (generally herded by casino makers) it's also the damage from depreciation of the mathematical chips that is a big damage or % taken from people.

BONUS AUDIO
Sound attached triggered me when watching 2 players try beat each other and basically one player winning lop-sided / heavily since the game dynamics are such a ultimatum (either you kill or be killed, rather than try do things cheaper it's to make it as expensive as possible, people going 'all in' to try and get more money and often failing, lots of people losing in same way trying to 'fight' financially at the gov organisers' profit)

example

Show older
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.