Curioso 🍉 🇺🇦
boosted
@thomaswilburn Oh, you know exactly how this will play out.
Google's search teams will build AI text and image tools into the search engine.
The Google Assistant teams will incorporate their own AI creation solution.
Clearly, the Android team will say, this is a mobile computing issue, so there'll be an Android app. Preinstalled and separate to the assistant AI and the search AI.
No, the Chrome/ChromeOS folks will say, this really needs to be baked into the browser.
The Google Workspace folk will create an enterprise app for it. Separately, AI writing will be built into Google Docs.
Three separate messaging teams will say it's a chat problem, and clearly what Google needs is a new chat app (or four) to solve it.
YouTube and Google Photos will see this as a video/photo problem, and will incorporate AI creation tools.
Google Cloud will create a cloud-based solution for third-party developers.
None of these tools will be interoperable. Different APIs. Most will be quietly closed within 12 months without warning.
What's the point of using React if you don't know HTML? React main feature is generate and maintain HTML structures you define tag by tag. React is of no use if you don't already know JS and HTML.
@thomholwerda
My teachers made an exception for me. But older kids books were mostly written on the XIX century, so no WWII or nazis there. Only white explorers killing black cannibal savages 🙈
If there is not enough trained people, they will come from abroad. Even if there are not enough people abroad (or your government manages to not let them come), people will retrain, so the shortage never will last more than the time needed to retrain, 8 years at most.
No matter what job profile you need, pay 10 million dollars a month, and you will find it.
Most of those shortages are caused by paying workers half (or less) of what they should be paid. Clients don't want to pay enough to pay such salaries? Sooner or later, they will, if they really need the work done.
Haberles explicado que la censura que les aplican en redes sociales cuando dicen burradas la decide una IA. A ver si luego les quedan ganas.
¿No hay ya NFTs de eso?
Lo siguiente es que alguien cree Mastodon Social Networks S.A.
Que me los conozco.
Y lo siguiente que Microsoft les meta un puro por usar las siglas de MSN en el mismo sector económico.
¿Quizá sea por la serie de animación?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleopatra_in_Space_(TV_series)
Decades ago, when somebody asked for a button, you only had to ask for text and purpose. There were no sliders, tabs, switches... Nowadays you need that, and at least a photo of the suspect in multiple states, and in a variety of sizes.
Yes, the number of different things you can do with such quality is very limited. But we're playing in a totally different league. And that's good.
Remove all borders and make it blank to achieve god mode.
You are right. Google Analytics doesn't give web admins any data they couldn't get by themselves. It only makes it way easier, enough to make it practical/affordable for people who wouldn't go so far otherwise. Sorry, I should have been more accurate.
I see your point: Google is not nearly as bad as Facebook/Meta and the others. They only sell aggregate metadata, which is bad enough, but not Facebook bad.
What we know is that they sell at least a part of our metadata to advertisers. Until GDPR, any user of Google Analytics could see your IP and what you did in his site in a very detailed way. If they give that to you for free (well, they get that data for themselves, but still), I wonder what are they giving to paying advertisers.
So the number and quality of extensions will continue to be very limited for all of them.
At least, until somebody does for cross desktop extensions the same others did for cross-environment applications: find a way to wrap up a kind of browser extension as a very wasteful cross desktop extension. Are we ready for +100MB desktop extensions?
The same story, again and again. Standardizing is hard, because technical and human hurdles. And it's true that can limit innovation when the thing is new and there is not enough knowledge. But the entire web is a very clear proof that it can be a really good thing.
There should be a common ground. But reinventing the wheel making it exactly what you like is easier than negotiate a compromise with others. My yard, my rules.
But if browser makers have been able to do an common API for browser extensions, they can do it too.
Not very polite to use another word in order to get people to read things they are clearly not interested in.
The kind of companies that opt you in something bad are the same kind of companies who change their preferences scheme from time to time, opting you in in whatever they like, with no warning.
The only way to win with these people is not to play.
Would love to use it, but I never got it to work with Vue.
Let's hope they allow us to have a vertical taskbar again soon.
