@torproject can anyone help me understand why the .onion address needs to be so human-unfriendly and not simply amnesty.onion?
@voxel @torproject thank you. Your response helped me look up a bit more information regarding further doubts I had
@mapto @torproject Onion addresses are based on hashes of public keys.
Tor v2 addresses were much shorther than v3, but also insecure.
@mapto @torproject
Because this is not just a website domain, this is a public key involved in the process of obtaining an end-to-end encryption. More here: https://community.torproject.org/onion-services/overview/
@corl3ss @torproject ok, then the weird thing is that the address starts meaningful :)
@mapto @torproject it just requires to bruteforce the address to match the needed keys. A lot of people do that (as we did http://oignonspeuuqi7ovpov7srtuhpqut2vgt7lcmenfwwvjgjnbbsx4qeyd.onion/ ). It is nicer than a full ramdom address :)
@mapto@qoto.org @torproject@mastodon.social Because the onion service address is an ed25519 cryptographic public key. Tor browser don't do regular DNS A/AAAA when it lookup onion service addresses.
Special Hostnames in Tor:
https://spec.torproject.org/address-spec
@mapto @torproject Yes, it's due how .onion sites work, you're aren't directly connecting to the server of amnesty instead your're connection to another row of 3 Tor nodes. The complicated domain tells your browser where connect to, which usually would do a DNS server or the host file (on Windows).