@DeborahJRoss free oxygen atoms are called "atomic oxygen", not "molecular oxygen" which refers to the usual dioxygen molecule O2. It's a mistake in the Livescience article.
@qurlyjoe I just checked with Google Meet to be sure... yes, it does this. Apparently, having no option to see the non-flipped image is a problem for some people: https://support.google.com/meet/thread/33711749/how-to-change-mirror-of-video?hl=en
@qurlyjoe I mean videoconferencing, like selfie mode on a camera, normally does the mirror flip just for you, allowing you to use it as a mirror. Meanwhile, the conference attendees see you normally.
@qurlyjoe nevertheless, the picture on the right looks off but that's how he sees himself in the mirror. Similarly, how I see myself in the mirror or in a videoconference looks normal to me but only to me!
@nonspecialist it's a slime mold. Fuligo septica or similar. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuligo_septica
@qurlyjoe oh no, the photo on the right has a grey mask, making it look more different than it should.
@SRLevine <insert free inspirational quote>
@lowqualityfacts RIP Steve
@FunkyBob @jemal does the maximumAge option not work? https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Geolocation/getCurrentPosition#maximumage
@LordWoolamaloo what bothers me is a common assumption that "these people of the past or from another culture were bad or stupid" instead of "they were like just like us and we're vulnerable to the same mass manipulation".
@dpiponi that's how witnesses become convinced they remember something that never happened. I watched a tv show about memory that had such experiment. It was concerning.
@europesays du moment que les voitures électriques explosent, Hollywood est sauvé.
@freemo I could list other reasons:
- because it's a net loss for society (it's destructive: there's very little gain for the murderer compared to the cost of making another human being)
- because it makes all of us feel threatened (and we care about not dying)
- cannibalism is frowned upon so what's the point of murder?
It's useful to notice that shallow imitation in art or "kitsch" will also borrow the terms used to describe what it imitates. This includes "fine art" - as a non-native English speaker and US resident, I had to look up the definition of "fine art" because it seemed to be applied only to a certain style of paintings in a commercial context. None of what I consider interesting art would be labeled as "fine art". It was my surprise to find out it was defined as an equivalent of the French term "beaux-arts" which is rarely used in French and refers to art for the sake of it as opposed to decorating functional objects (decorative arts, "arts décoratifs"). I've grown allergic to the term "fine art" just like I've always been allergic to the brand of art it refers to today. I won't use the term "kitsch" to label the work of others because it's pretentious and mean but I will also not use the term "fine art" to describe what I do.
@KitOz I like the Dutch name!
Elfinnote, October 2023
61 cm × 91 cm, acrylic and brass leaf on canvas
https://martinj.art
#art #artistonmastodon #abstractart
@KitOz I'm not familiar with this one but Phlebia tremellosa is a possible match. I would check the underside. https://www.mykoweb.com/CAF/species/Phlebia_tremellosa.html
The attractive force that causes floating Cheerios to clump together increases in strength when objects are withdrawn from a liquid. #physics https://physics.aps.org/articles/v16/s163?utm_campaign=weekly&utm_medium=email&utm_source=emailalert
@UP8 I'm very skeptical about these results or what to do with them. Maybe people who don't easily get angry should allow themselves to be angry on occasion to boost their motivation? Anger is certainly not a good thing for me.
@avsm @whitequark c'mon
French mad scientist dwelling in California