@toplesstopics Hi, there is an initiative for a new server list underway and i see an issue with a proposed rule. The thing is that nudity and pornography are proposed to be treated the same, and that feels wrong.
I thought before i say something, you might be a lot more qualified to propose a better solution. I hope this is a reasonable request, if so please share your thoughts on this.
Easy to read pdf:
https://jeffreyfreeman.me/files/united_federation_of_instances_proposal.pdf
Please see chapter 3, rule 6 for what i mean.
Github repo:
https://gitlab.com/ufoi/constitution/-/blob/master/proposal.tex
(line 173 is what i mean, currently:
\item Nudity and pornography must be posted either unlisted, with a content warning, or both.)
Also please feel free to open this as an issue over on the Repor.. if someone disagrees with the direction the current draft goes we want to open public discourse aboutit and make sure we consider all views before any decisions are made.
@freemo
It's absolutely wrong to say nudity and pormography are the same and I bet you even include "female looking nipples" as "nudity" but not "male looking nipples." if mastodon could not be #sexist, #misogynistic and #transphobic like all the centralized platforms run by #thepatriarchy, that would be amazing.
@admitsWrongIfProven
Just suggest more appropriate wording on a merge request, this is why we asked you.. I will be happy to consider improved wording.
@freemo @toplesstopics Exactly. We should not make the rules as men, we should listen to someone who knows the impact of misoginy. Cleo, please help us out here with a proposal how the rule should look!
@toplesstopics @freemo Maybe, the federated nature of this can help us push some ethics over the discrimination you so rightly criticise. At the very least, we don't have a company in power that can just pull the rug for economical reasons, like it happened to many times before. No ad revenue here to be considered.