@realcaseyrollins @freemo @conatus he hasn't been elected yet.

@icedquinn

No, but he will be.

@realcaseyrollins @conatus

@freemo @icedquinn @conatus eh we’ll see

@realcaseyrollins

Sure, if he has actual evidence I welcome him to present it. So far even if there is fraud he hasnt produced a single bit of evidence and, well, he isnt a man who tends to be very good at accomplishing what he says he will so I dont have high hopes until I see some.

@icedquinn @conatus

@freemo @realcaseyrollins @icedquinn @conatus

> hasn't produced a single bit of evidence

This is head in sand level denial.

@moth @freemo @conatus @icedquinn Wait hol up that raysis man said “there is no room for prejudice” in his first day in office???

HOLD THE PRESSES

@moth @conatus @freemo @icedquinn He has presented some evidence but to my knowledge it hasn’t been super specific. His lawyers and such have more of the deets than he does

@realcaseyrollins @conatus @freemo @icedquinn

If it's already sliding from "not a single bit" to "not a bit that convinced me" so who cares where the goal posts end up, it's clearly an issue of adjusting against momentum for the speaker.

@moth @conatus @freemo @icedquinn Hey it was Freemo who said not a bit, not me.

@realcaseyrollins

To be clear I was referring to evidence that there had been some orchestrated effort by officials to commit voter fraud. The case of individuals committing fraud on their own, without cooperation from officials, and at the risk of arrest is relevant, but not what I was referring to when I stated it..

The legal arguments would be far more complicated if we talk about random extremely small scale individuals committing fraud considering they would include both fraud in favor of democrats and fraud in favor of republicans. So while this is something that could be shown at very small scales (or maybe larger if there is evidence to show it, who knows) that's going to be a tough case to argue.

@icedquinn @moth @conatus

@freemo @realcaseyrollins @icedquinn @conatus

Every single news station making 99% change winning predictions, calling states the second they opened, and censoring everyone who disagrees isn't collusive enough, he basically needs notarized plans from Biden's desk.

@moth

Are you suggesting how news calls a state after the state closes polling somehow dictates who wins? Even if they intentionally miss called states in bidens favor, how does that change the actual number of votes counted?

I have absolutely no doubt the News is extremely biased and is likely to do a poor job both predicting and calling the elections as a result. While we should of course denounce the news for doing so and refuse to give them our service how do you feel this equates to election fraud?

@conatus @realcaseyrollins @icedquinn

@freemo @moth @conatus @realcaseyrollins @icedquinn
are you stupid? you need to scroll thru my timeline for the past week if you want to see evidence of voter fraud. it's OVERWHELMING

@meowski

If you think calling me stupid is going to convince me to invest time into reading your time line then you really arent very good at this. If the very first words you speak show you arent even in emotional control of your own behaviors then clearly I wont consider you very high on the list of people worth listening to. Now if you'd like to try again (I will give anyone a pass) then I dont mind considering your points.

@icedquinn @realcaseyrollins @moth @conatus

@freemo @icedquinn @realcaseyrollins @moth @conatus
only the most brainwashed and willfully ignorant people haven't figured out what happened by now. there are 2 types of people still saying there's no evidence of fraud. severely brainwashed low information individuals, and shills.

either way, yeet yourself