FreeSchool: Learn Respect Love @freeschool@social.cleverlibre.org

"Long live Freenode!" [IRC Take-over, Moving services to OFTC]

https://n0toose.net/posts/long-live-freenode/

"All kingdoms must fall someday. Even the virtual ones."

#IRC Alternatives to #Freenode:

#Libera (New by old Freenode staff)
https://libera.chat/

#OFTC (2 decades old)
https://oftc.net/

Different ways to the mountain.
For me it's good luck to everyone while right now thinking Gib's and Tib's of data are increasingly losing their worth if you are not sharing AND making human contact part of the eco system (i.e. data stores and more copies of the same is waste or just less ideal while the main point is HUMAN contact is less in the process which is the clever-hard part).
Why I moan about the matrix is because people with clipboards and counting is has lost it's own meaning in the process of and valuation of humans. So for HUMANS <---- (caps = emphasis) going away from science only ways IS the way somewhat or just not playing with it too much... but like perhaps much of history it's a lot of all or nothing where from not fault of your own or the sciences, you just get too deep in this construct and even a perfect win in this area = LEAVING A LOT OF HUMANITY OUT... which is why I think it's the preferred choice in any kind of authoritarian discrimination precisely as it leaves out and discriminations pretty much the whole of civilisation (of course one doesn't have to be all or nothing but give people more ignorant hammers and make them dependent or only count in these ways and well guess what happens? Exactly what we get now... So again it doesn't win for humanity (we arguably go to the top or had more than enough science and just screw it up faster)

Ok this is not about emotional output... I'm seeing maybe 1 other conversation about this... and so would like people to sort of represent STEM a bit more here... and say why not *precisely* :LP because I think it's important for humanity not to keep digging so hard a pit going humanly NOWHERE OR MAKING THE SAME ALMOST NON-PERSPECTIVE OF HUMANITY WORSE.
Doesn't helps it's so fast and funded by those that want and there isn't exactly jobs in the other areas of humanity but still YOU HAVE A CHOICE TO CONSIDER THE ABOVE even in theory that you would starve because governments are not interested in solving those other things... even making / oppre$$ing even more with science tech....

There are many cultures that they will not discuss their weakness... and while that actually go, it needs to be more chosen as when it's never said that you're ill or what your principles are (which avoids debate and focus and keeps power) and children didn't know for years... that is terrible.
I can say people can have 'over-feelings' or feel things are too negative but scary is people have this kind of pride or false misconception of what is good that actually doesn't move into the now and tries to keep what was back then bad (authoritarian patriarchy which I can even enjoy as a good management skill or something and let people run it) but to not have development or silent iron fist stuff amongst parents (and mum not saying anything) seems FAAAKTUP.

Restricting it to short notions, not helping humans expand their emotions and feeling is an ignorance and often aggression but cutting out what they don't want and what humans need (expression).
That seems to serve why we are in protest mode or can't get out of what we don't have control or input over.
Without blaming people, the short text, perhaps scientifically makes sense but humanly and generally doesn't... because it expect someone to be a PRO without training from a system (the system funds and trains well the other stuff it wants).

Our ability somewhat is stifled and perhaps people / scientific people don't see the problem.

A 2nd point is closely related, which I'll label loosely ' Scientific / Numerically Measured Objectification / Categorisation of people etc ' (do help me name it better)... all of which are like looking through numerical glasses or a kind of filtered separation / disconnect on people since you are dealing in what YOU or sciences think can be measured (feelings / emotions / a persons ever-changing direction which needs constant asking indirectly and directly... serious and unserious... so this isn't bashing scientific approach or the labels mentions above (again do give me more ammunition with me using it for hate but categorising people and putting them in boxes for matrices they think will work (and do but only towards ignoring things and more about certain 'efficiency' and not the 'free time' anologue happiness enjoy life stuff... it implies every second and every moment in ITS way not the individual humans.
Will cut myself short here- but I'd also like to be stopped if there are points where unique humans and this living rather than measuring is totally wrong (I can switch if I get the 'ah point' which maths does but with humans DOESN'T

Who is making the numbers is a massive point too and implies bias in everything other than the very very basic counting (as you can see in accounting, exploited to this day and mislabelled with people having no power over that)

Thanks for you attention.

" Some people wouldn't trust their "countries" to hold a glass of water for them and certainly would not let their "digital footprint" into a country that has an adversarial stance to its minorities. "

#FreeSchool #Quotes #People
- https://qoto.org/@dpwiz/108401341612040863

Friendship seems the overall goal.
Not always full-power love or misplaced all-in jumps.
First understand friendship.

[picture is of a ripped piece of paper, crumpled up and thrown out, then put back together again]

" Go Plant Yourself ! " ----> The best green confusing productive comeback or insult !

"Yeah I'm talking to you buddy!... You heard me right...
...Go Plant Yourself ! " #GPY

and that can funnel anger against them since you might think having more popularity changes others in proportionate or bigger scale... (which maybe it does or doesn't but the point is to say you wouldn't have cared if it was just another person with much less theoretical 'weight' like a famous Britney Spears or Micheal Jackson of the Tech industry...

While Tech leaders yes probably do have more weight as decision makers ACTUALLY they equally just are one person which YOU ALSO FOLLOW AND PERPETUATE because you hate them!)

I'm not saying don't follow me....
lol - BUT REMEMBER those you hate you perpetuate! Keep mentioning Facebook and guess what... that sticks in people's head and they might check their FB right after you complain...

So I mean cultivate your own mindset and take notes from them, but work on those closer to the ground / not in the sky - don't worry it say 4 or 40K followers as it's overrated and can actually suck you in / funnel your anger.
So for me I stopped following those famous that don't answer and often I was triggering myself in seeing over and over as they did TLDR short messaging causing waves of attention and never really replying... TLDR for what they actually caused or didn't want actually to read in reply... *maybe just get more readership*)

So take the seeds that communicate back to you remember big people are not the only one's that have shit that's hot lol!... <--- a bit of fun (you do the homework also I'm here to pingpong a bit),..

You get replies here and even the discomfort of dispelling the reality which famous people unintentionally or not need to cloak themselves with just to keep their focus and shit together, and kinda keep up appearances rather than engage with your shit also :)

If you stick with just my account for a bit I think you can get a lot and if you don't I'd like to know how / why.
I think you can prove a lot (and disprove a lot) for yourself... and this is useful in itself (also in the what not). Who else will say without worrying about their image -LOL...
YOLO (you only live once!
Well that's the attitude for now!

OK Strategy: Follow 1 person heavily (all-in perhaps for a few days) once you see they can answer in 25mins (me) and that in itself can be helpful to prove / disprove / get ideas (wrong or right, just sPEEd)
Once you see and feel THEIR POWER (muhahaha) and string what you can together it's overall + to do this (fragmentation encourages breakage / weak signal not daring enough )

and then drop me when you're done (we all win don't worry) and come back later if you believe in this process and see increments.

DO
message read
breath in / out,
drink hot tea
message write
LOOP

If you believe in yourself or others (or both / that that's all 1 thing) then continue to ask / absorb / mix yourself. Do make sure it's quality from me and you, but just contact and see what happens...

(applies with both your stuff and my stuff and the general overview)

Self-advertising is ok... I'll say if I'm into it etc..

You'll get some overload for sure but if you're dealing with dead fish out there or hidden-politeness / defensive strategy that's 100% not the way.
Speed read - get it out and get your shit together.

Get lively - make contact!

"The legal framework is like a shrinking structure of an increasing list of what we can't do. "
(my definition)

Indeed all push-back is illegal or can be viewed such somehow with 'pick and choose' strategy to try take things down...

It's just about being ready for most of those things and piling forward sometimes as push-back or however you feel it works, even if you're alone and then only sometimes together.

@darius

Hi and good work on an Events organizing system for the Fediverse ( like Facebook ).

I was looking at Polls with optional visibility after voting (via optional opt-in ) before coming across your efforts...
https://qoto.org/@freeschool/108057719432336997 (2nd idea)

...so basically people could continue their affinity and encourage it after voting for things / sharing what they like most... seems it already does the work of attracting people...

... so again I think using polls is clever and even before this I thought it would be good to allow one's vote to be public (or time-expired / self-destruct / perishable) so atl people could connect right away and actually contact each other (maybe as a temporary group and then people could choose who they would like to message / follow etc)

I would like to hear if any privacy issues with this... right now I'm thinking after a successful poll why not? ( if it's with consent and technologically not wild. Not relying on user ignorance either to tick a box but yeah having the default off and then click even twice to say "I don't mind if someone contacts me who was also connected to the poll - this data will be available for 1 day etc" ).

IN SUMMARY - A way of people meeting similar up, through polls or through events (like weekly chats, or personal project polls).

What I suggested to Mastodon was titles:
POLLS WITH OPTIONAL VISIBILITY AFTER VOTING (OPT-IN / OPTIONAL CONTACT METHOD)

Good work even if I'm more of a people person and shoot-tin-can ideas... because making it work toward people actually talking to each other 'for real' is the main thing for me :D

Kudos.

Your text below just for reference:

" It's based on the simple, open source, privacy-respecting event organizing tool https://gath.io

The attached video is a work-in-progress preview and shows compatibility with Mastodon. My hope is to get it working with lots of software, including stuff like Friendica that supports events and calendars. "

https://friend.camp/@darius/103398661253205349