us pol 

just realized how cursed trumps presidential library will be.

us pol 

@conatus I'm less worried about Trump's library and More saddened by the fact that we just elected the first Segregationist in my living history as president. Never have I been so ashamed to be an american than I am right now :(

us pol 

@freemo @conatus Wait…you’re American? I always thought you lived somewhere else man

re: us pol 

@realcaseyrollins

Sure, if he has actual evidence I welcome him to present it. So far even if there is fraud he hasnt produced a single bit of evidence and, well, he isnt a man who tends to be very good at accomplishing what he says he will so I dont have high hopes until I see some.

@icedquinn @conatus

re: us pol 

@moth @freemo @conatus @icedquinn Wait hol up that raysis man said “there is no room for prejudice” in his first day in office???

HOLD THE PRESSES

re: us pol 

@moth @conatus @freemo @icedquinn He has presented some evidence but to my knowledge it hasn’t been super specific. His lawyers and such have more of the deets than he does

re: us pol 

@realcaseyrollins @conatus @freemo @icedquinn

If it's already sliding from "not a single bit" to "not a bit that convinced me" so who cares where the goal posts end up, it's clearly an issue of adjusting against momentum for the speaker.

re: us pol 

@realcaseyrollins

To be clear I was referring to evidence that there had been some orchestrated effort by officials to commit voter fraud. The case of individuals committing fraud on their own, without cooperation from officials, and at the risk of arrest is relevant, but not what I was referring to when I stated it..

The legal arguments would be far more complicated if we talk about random extremely small scale individuals committing fraud considering they would include both fraud in favor of democrats and fraud in favor of republicans. So while this is something that could be shown at very small scales (or maybe larger if there is evidence to show it, who knows) that's going to be a tough case to argue.

@icedquinn @moth @conatus

re: us pol 

@freemo @realcaseyrollins @icedquinn @conatus

Every single news station making 99% change winning predictions, calling states the second they opened, and censoring everyone who disagrees isn't collusive enough, he basically needs notarized plans from Biden's desk.

re: us pol 

@moth

Are you suggesting how news calls a state after the state closes polling somehow dictates who wins? Even if they intentionally miss called states in bidens favor, how does that change the actual number of votes counted?

I have absolutely no doubt the News is extremely biased and is likely to do a poor job both predicting and calling the elections as a result. While we should of course denounce the news for doing so and refuse to give them our service how do you feel this equates to election fraud?

@conatus @realcaseyrollins @icedquinn

re: us pol 

@freemo @moth @conatus @icedquinn If #Trump wins the legal challenges enough to have more delegates but the #MSM refuses to say so, well…

re: us pol 

@freemo @conatus @icedquinn @moth Pay attention. The #MSM can force the populace to believe that whoever they want is president, so long as they act in concert.

re: us pol 

@realcaseyrollins

Except they dont act in concert.. A bunch of news is biased left, a bunch of news is biased right. So you wont get them acting in concert at all, and we never do. Half of them agree on one thing, and the other half agree on the opposite thing.

@icedquinn @moth @conatus

re: us pol 

@freemo @realcaseyrollins @icedquinn @conatus

> a bunch of news is biased right

Like Fox! /s

> So you wont get them acting in concert at all, and we never do.

Head in sand.

re: us pol 

@moth @freemo @conatus @icedquinn Look at the news Freemo. See how easy it was to convince #FoxNews to declare #JoeBiden the likely winner? And of course smaller conservative outlets follow them so most just fell in line.

re: us pol 

@realcaseyrollins

did the other outlets convince them, or did the numbers convince them (which may have been the incorrect numbers if fraud exists mind you). the official numbers streaming in did, in fact, make biden look like the winner.

Are you actually suggesting the left leaning knews all knew the "real" numbers and knew Biden didnt win, but engaged in fraud just to mislead others, meanwhile fox had some fake numbers and they were fooled because the other news outlets cooperated?

@icedquinn @moth @conatus

re: us pol 

@freemo @realcaseyrollins @icedquinn @conatus

> the official numbers streaming in did, in fact, make biden look like the winner.

That's not true for a few of a key swing states, like PA, closer states, like AZ (being called before they opened so it was entirely on wild predictions and zero data) or even some of the safe Trump states like AK which were not called for days even though safe calls.
Follow

re: us pol 

@moth

Well yes thats true.. But PA was called for trump on all the liberal leaning networks I watched and didnt flip to biden until days after. I simultanious watched them call states live across 5 networks this year.

@icedquinn @conatus @realcaseyrollins

re: us pol 

@freemo @icedquinn @conatus @realcaseyrollins

I think RCP's call to freeze at last known good and post that things were complicated was the best call that was made so far in retrospect.
Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.